collage no names

Enclosure of the Soul


Written by – TJ Aguilera  (PROFILE/BIO:

You find someone you think is true, and fall in love with them. But the person has many walls built up. Try to reach through them and show how much you care, but the other is damaged and has a dark perception of the world. They don’t really show themselves.

ES1You’ve opened up and offered your heart as home. Although deep in the others mind, they realize how much love they are given; it doesn’t matter because their heart is too protected, but are happy knowing what‘s being given. They’re scared and resistant.

You love them so much. They became everything to you. At first looking to them as someone to make you happy, but ending up trying to be everything to make them happy instead. You lose yourself.

For some reason, as desperate as you attempt, they just can’t feel love and are floundering and unable to connect. It’s difficult to hold the hand inside someone who has yet to come to grips with themselves. They’re simply not ready; still blind. Sabotaging their own existence since they can’t see being lovable; so rejecting what’s offered.

That’s when you realize you will never get through to them, because they won’t let you in. They aren’t capable of loving back. What you thought was inside of them really isn’t there, but you love them anyway.

After it’s all said and done, you don’t think they knew how much you really wanted to care and how sincerely wanted to be the one to make them happy, and vice versa. They cause you nothing but hurt, but you love them for what and who they are; even being too broken and self-centered to appreciate being loved.

When you look at them you see nothing now because what you originally thought you saw doesn’t even really exist. This nothing becomes your truth. You have to remind yourself they can’t give back and are incapable of living up to expectations to even accept love.

They will never love another until they come to terms to love themselves.


(MORE from TJ:      

Holiday Songs Corrupting Christmas


Written by – TJ Aguilera  (PROFILE/BIO:

I saw Mommy kissing Santa Claus –

Real nice. Let’s teach infidelity to our children. Apparently Mommy had “Daddy Issues” growing up that she’s targeting older men to work out those repressed memories. Guess it beats being a stripper.


TJ1Frosty the Snow Man –

— Weren’t we taught not to talk to strangers as a kid? Enough said.


Santa Claus is coming to town –

— Fair warning that a Peeping-Tom will be stalking every move you make to know if you’re naughty or nice. Then give treats in a stocking and gifts if you do what he wants.  “Be a good little kid and get in the tinted window van now. I have lots of candy and a puppy for you!” That is if he doesn’t find you in the mall first so you can sit on his lap for a cheap thrill.


We three Kings of Orient Are –

—  Leave it to dudes to shop. Bringing the baby frankincense and myrrh to give him a potpourri asthma attack. Not to mention gold to choke on. And how long did it take them to get to Bethlehem following that star? Pfft… And people say women are bad with directions. Geez.


Up on the Housetop –

— Down through the chimney with good Saint Nick huh? Oh, so now we’re acceptable of breaking and entering. I suppose it is ok being a reverse scenario and he’s bringing instead of taking. Except the whole cookie thing snatching the treats.


The Twelve Days of Christmas –

TJ2– What kind of values is this teaching? Condoning greed and buying ones love. Just wrong I tell ya. Not to mention with this method, you’ll need to take a second mortgage out to buy all this crap.


Little Drummer Boy –

— That’s a real smart idea. Let’s bang a drum in a new born baby’s ear so he cries and cries and has anxiety. I’m sure Mary totally appreciated that. You have no gift to bring, so you choose to perform a rock concert for poor kid?

I’m sure there are more songs I can tear apart, but I won’t because you’ll be cracking up if you try to go out singing Christmas carols now.

Merry Ho Ho folks!!!


(MORE from TJ:      

Fear of the Unknown


Written by – TJ Aguilera  (PROFILE/BIO:

Throughout life we meet many people who inspire us emotionally; provoking and instilling thoughts of future possibilities together.

FU1There are times that this happens with others we meet where sadly we come to think they are too far away in distance to further pursue. You meet, it sparks, you have a good time together, and then life goes back to your normal routine.

This may be a summer fling, someone you met on a business trip, maybe while in the military meeting a native resident in another country when deployed, or even on vacation.

The fairness is NONE.

Of all the available prospects in the world, amongst the millions, the one that you just so happen to find to be a suitable match ends of being inconvenient to how your life is structured – AT THAT MOMENT IN TIME.

We have obligations we assume cannot be adjusted to move forward with the person such as your career and children, maybe even your education. The costs of travel to maintain that relationship can become financially consuming. Taking off work is difficult being most are only granted a certain amount of earned vacation time. Time spent with your children may be altered to go out of town to visit the person of interest.

Your efforts put forth to arrange your visits can be stressful. It’s demanding to make time for each other.

When you finally get to see each other your time is blissful. When you leave each other it’s despairingly heartbreaking not knowing when you’ll see each other again.

It could end up failing unless one of you uproot your life or make changes to keep being a significant part of each other’s.

Do we really have to be stuck with the people within our own city to choose from when the options are limitless across your state, your region, hell the whole country??

Unfortunately for most, their analysis of that would be a disturbing YES.

So one must ask – What is the purpose that this wonderful person was put into your life, just so you can be disheartened that it seems impossible to make it “happen”?

FU2The only answer I can come up with to this ponder is to make you think about your direction in life and what is important to you, and what you are willing to sacrifice for another to join together on the possibility of solely a WHAT IF basis.

WHAT IF you can’t find a job when if you move by them?

WHAT IF this compromises the quality development with your children?

WHAT IF it just flat doesn’t work out?

Are you willing to take these risks on a “WHAT IF”?

Well I’m here to tell you; there’s a gamble taken with any relationship you encounter. There is always the UNKNOWN. That’s with anything in life you strive for regardless how to plot and plan your future endeavors.

So WHY NOT go for it? WHY NOT try it out?

We should go for ALL THINGS in life we feel will make us happy.

WHAT IF you regret NOT trying?

REGRET is part of the UNKNOWN. Living with regret can be worse than heartbreak.

We may have answers to the previous question — What is the purpose that this wonderful person was put into your life, just so you can be disheartened that it seems impossible to make it “happen”?

WHAT IF the purpose was for something greater in life, and meeting that person was the stepping stone to get you there?

WHAT IF your dream job awaits you?

WHAT IF the school system in another area offers more opportunity for your child’s future?

WHAT IF it wasn’t supposed to last after all, but that relationship was the beginning of your unknown destiny to get you where you needed to be?

WHAT IF you never know?

Can you live with regretting the unknown of what you may be missing out on?

It’s all quite unpredictable. That’s the risk. But in all reality, you take the same risk with those you have relationships with in your own zip code.

You can’t predict if they’ll die on you and you’re stuck with a mortgage and children you cannot afford to take care of on your own.

You can’t predict if they’ll cheat on you and leave you high and dry.

FU3You can’t predict if the company you work for in your current city for will lay you off.

We are only human, and despite the geographic area individuals reside, we all fear the ongoing list of what if’s and unknowns of the exact same things regarding relationships.

So sometimes it’s ok to take a chance on the unknown with people. If you don’t, you may regret missing the opportunities in life you didn’t even know existed – Those that you are yet to know.


(MORE from TJ:       

Bras Are The Devil

I hate bras. No, I take that back. I DESPISE bras.

BD1Bobby, that-that woman (Vicki Vallencourt) is the devil.

Naw bitch. She’s not the devil mama. BRAS ARE!!!

And I like Vicki, and she like me back! And she showed me her boobies and I like them too!



This bra is too loose

This bra is too tight

No bra fits juuuuust right!!

It is so damn time consuming in the venture to get a sufficient fit for comfort.

Unfortunately, that never happens when your chest feels asphyxiated like a mummy from compression of a bra.

Such a vast variety to choose from that all seem to serve their own unique purpose.

Here you find one that you can compromise your breathing capability with, and tolerate – as far as a semi-decent fit – but the lining is so thin, your nipples poke out like the temperature popper on a Thanksgiving turkey when done.



I’ll tell you what pisses me off.

The other day I was waltzing around Walmart initially to make a purchase of yummies for a BBQ the next day.  As I’m zig-zagging between aisles towards the food section, I pass by a rack of bras for $3.96 on clearance.

Hold up!!! What do I see? I picked up THE SAME BRA that I bought at Victoria Secret on a 2 for $49.50 sale. HEATED!!!

Needless to say Victoria Secret IS NOT going to be too thrilled about the $150-return ofbrassieres they’re in for. (I bought 6-bras. Do the math.)

Moral of the story is you don’t need an overpriced fancy name on the item for it to accommodate your needs of a titty-holster.

Somewhere in Cambodia there is one factory full of 10-yr. olds stitching the same textile and separately putting various name brand labels on them at the end of the assembly line.

BD3Which price do you really want to pay?



Sister sizes. What the hell is this crap all about anyway?

So I for example (yes I’m putting this out there) am measured at a 36D.

BUT if the bra I ironically want is not available in that size, either a 34DD or a 38C will be equivalent.

Now I don’t know what mathematician decided this is the rule, but if I take a measuring tape around my torso and it say 36 inches, how in the fuck do I lose 2 inches and gain plumper tits to fill a larger cup because the store is out of my measurement?

Or my back all of the sudden magically becomes broader and I lose fatness in my tits for less of a cup.




Pointless for big-breasted women because they squeeze the ta-tas like a boa constrictor and boobage is buldging out making you look like you seriously don’t know how to shop for a bra.

These bras can also be a total disappointment to men because when the woman takes the bra off she may either look like a teenage boy… or a cow whose saggy udders are ready to be milked.

What sucks is – ironically – push-ups just so happen to have the sexiest designs with this style of bra. Maybe it’s to disguise being a titty-trickster when taking it off in the heat of the moment to distract the guy from reality with the aesthetic appeal of a beautiful garment.

Doubt it.



BD2They are uncomfortable as hell. People who make wire bras should all die a horrible death due to this discomfort. A man probably created them like high heels to be spiteful and torture women.

They painfully rub in the armpit and leave chafe marks under your breast. Not to mention the pressure digging in on the ribcage of the wire makes you nauseous and gives you heartburn from the tightness.



Small tits – nothing to hold bra on, falls down.

Big tits – boobs too heavy, bra falls down.

This bra is made just to frustrate us. Enough said.



Many women feel they are now exempt from bra wearing with their new bubbly boobies that won’t really bounce. Give it a few years of no bra wearing and they will start to though.

This is because eventually gravity will still come into play and the weight of the water balloons will pull the skin and stretch like Gumby (skin is only so elastic ya’ know). This is especially true if you fluctuate in weight.

So now we’re back to the cow udder dilemma from not wearing a bra because you thought your credit approved; due to no insurance plan covering cosmetic surgery of new perky tits were invincible against Newton’s law of physical weighted objects to fall toward the ground.

I am the bearer of bad news here. You still need to wear the damn bra, oh ye enhanced ladies.

The bonus though about getting breast implants on credit is even if you don’t make your payment on time; no one can take them from you like they can your car or house upon default!!!

It’s not like the repo man is gonna’ come and take a boob ‘til you catch payments up. Or better yet, come partially deflate one or both depending on the percentage in amount of payment you’re behind on.

When you pay up, we’ll fill ‘em back up!



When it’s all said and done, unfortunately, the bra that won’t make you feel like a slave in a harness and that will give the best support, not ride up your back, nor worry about the straps self-adjusting that slide down your shoulder as you move, will be the ugliest most unappealing bra in existence.

BD4I’m talking about the bra that matches granny panties that would be worn during a violent menstrual cycle, and that you can toss out all thought of ever getting laid in.

You know the one.

I’d say good luck finding a bra you like that fits well, but winning the lottery has a higher probability of happening.


(MORE from TJ:

Obscenity Legally Defined

Many dispute as to what constitutes as obscenity.

OD1But did you know in order to legally be considered “obscene”, the criteria making something as such must pass a 3 Prong Obscenity Test referred to as the MILLER TEST?

The name is derived from the landmark United States Supreme Court case of Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973).

In an overview of the case, the defendant mailed brochures that contained pictures of sexually explicit activities to individuals who had not requested the material, and the individuals notified the police.

After a trial, defendant was convicted of violating California Penal Code § 311.2(a) by knowingly distributing obscene matter.

The Court defined the standards (used currently still today) that were to be used to identify obscene material that a state might regulate without infringing on the First Amendment, applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.

This is where the 3 Prong Test comes into play for the basic guidelines as how The Court held the standard to determine whether material was obscene:

(a) whether the average person, applying contemporary community standards, not national standards, taken as a whole, would find that the work predominantly appealed to the prurient interest,

(b) whether the work depicted or portrayed sexual conduct in a patently offensive way specifically defined by applicable state law, and

(c) whether the work, taken as a whole,  lacked serious scientific, literary, artistic, political, or value. (SLAP value)


Let’s clarify some things, starting with part (a) –

First, prurient interest is otherwise that which is sexually arousing, or appealing to have lustful and lascivious sexual desire.

Secondly, let’s look at contemporary community and national standards applied by the average person.

Who is the average person”, you may ask?

When an “average person” is asked to apply contemporary community standards when considering if the material is prurient, the material must not be aimed at a deviant group of jurors so not judged by a susceptible or sensitive person, but that of the average person instead.

Juries are to apply contemporary community standards of the State, and not some hypothetical or unascertainable standard of the entire United States of America.

To require a State to structure obscenity proceedings around evidence of a “national community standard” would be an exercise in futility as pointless or useless because people in different States vary in their tastes and attitudes, and this diversity is not to be strangled by the absolutism of imposed uniformity.

If using “national” standards, this would imply that materials found tolerable in some places, but not under the “national” criteria, will nevertheless be unavailable where they are acceptable.

This would then leave potential for suppression of a single nationwide standard in terms of danger to free expression as the same in accordance with local tastes.


OD2Clarification in (b) –

The phrase “patently offensive” first appeared in the case of Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957), that Miller cites within, referring to any obscene acts or materials that are considered to be openly, plainly, or clearly visible as offensive to the viewing public.

–  Patently offensive representations or descriptions of ultimate sexual acts, normal or perverted, actual or simulated.

–  Patently offensive representations or descriptions of masturbation, excretory functions, and lewd exhibition of the genitals.

The material discussed in this case is more accurately defined as “pornography” or “pornographic material.”

“Pornography” derives from the Greek (porne, harlot, and graphos, writing).

According to Webster’s Third New International Dictionary, the word now means:

1: a description of prostitutes or prostitution.

2: a depiction (as in writing or painting) of licentiousness or lewdness: a portrayal of erotic behavior designed to cause sexual excitement.

Pornographic material which is obscene forms a sub-group of all “obscene” expression, but not the whole, at least as the word “obscene” is now used in our language.

The words “obscene material,” as used in this case, has a specific judicial meaning which derives from the Roth case, of obscene material “which deals with sex.”

It is presumed “obscenity” is to be “utterly without redeeming social importance,” and that to prove obscenity it must be affirmatively established that the material is “utterly without redeeming social value.”


Clarification in (c) –

For example of “lacking” – a shameful or morbid interest in nudity, sex, or excretion, which goes substantially beyond customary limits of candor in description or representation of such matters and is matter which is utterly without redeeming social importance.

“Serious in scientific, literary, artistic, or political value” can be broken down this way:

Something of a social value, as implied by the four types mentioned, would be that of resources allocated and used for the collective benefit to a community.

Scientific means would be for medical, anatomy, or educational purposes.

Literary works of writing, in general, focuses on the subjects of the narrative to create “introspective, in-depth character studies” of “interesting, complex and developed” characters.

Artistic would be showing the appreciation or sensitivity of beauty through imagination and skill.

Political is in the sense of being uses as a point of view, or argument that is particular to being privileged that passes strict scrutiny standards.



So in a nutshell, obscene material is unprotected by the first Amendment.

There are inherent dangers in undertaking to regulate any form of expression. State statutes designed to regulate obscene materials must be carefully limited, and it appears that local, and not national, norms of what’s considered to be acceptable conduct make those statutes.

As a result, the permissible scope of such regulation is confined to works which depict or describe sexual conduct. That conduct must be specifically defined by the applicable state law, as written or authoritatively construed, as well as not having social value to the community.


(MORE from TJ:

Putting Yourself First

As I backtrack through time of my own life and previous relationships, and as well as those witnessed, I can’t help but stop and think about how much time people waste on putting more effort into the relationship as opposed to themselves first.

Many feel they need to have another in their life to feel whole. Yet they bypass their own life’s internal happiness thinking a relationship is needed to suffice that constant yearning to fill a void.

YFCThey neglect themselves always thinking they need to be in a relationship to be happy.

So here some sit, with numerous attempts with resulting in failed relationships, and never have accomplished their personal goals or dreams on account of putting their own needs on the back burner.

It may be your education that you put on hold so your partner could finish theirs first.

It may be your partner wanted to relocate areas of living, and you gave up a career you had been building just to let it all go to waste on behalf of “love”.

What’s such a shame is that people give up these things for themselves, and then too much time has gone by, or other circumstances have occurred that have now permanently prevented their ambitions and things they’ve worked hard for to go straight in the toilet.

There is severe regret because you’re not even with the person any longer.

What’s even worse is if you’ve given up things such as your education or field of work, and allowed yourself to become financially dependent upon that partner. Well if that relationship is failing and you become unhappy, now you’re stuck!!

Part of what I’m trying to relay here is that we must always enforce the fact upon ourselves the “Take Care of ME First” attitude; instead of thinking you need someone to do that for you, or to think you can do it later on your own.

We can’t have it in our heads that we need someone to take care of us. Take care of yourself first.

What if that person is no longer in your life? Then what? How will you take care of you when you’ve always relied on them? Where’s your back up plan in case the relationship isn’t what you want? Now you are forced to stay in a miserable unhappy relationship because you can’t be self-sufficient without that person.

You’ve totally forgotten about your own happiness now and can’t free yourself of the situation.

Another key concern regarding this is that we must find self-fulfillment within ourselves first, and then worry about adding others into our little world.

Think about it. What does the other person have to look forward to if you have nothing to bring to the table but your broken dreams and sorrows? Honestly, who wants to deal with damaged goods? Work to fix YOU and the things that make YOU feel complete.

It’s those things that attract others to you and make them intrigued to want to learn more about you.

If you don’t, you will only blame yourself, and blame the other person for putting your dreams, priorities, aspirations, and goals aside thinking you HAVE TO HAVE this relationship to grow when you haven’t finished growing on your own into the person you desire to ultimately be.

YF2Now that’s not to say when in a relationship you don’t grow together, because you absolutely do. But do you really know yourself? Will it be the real you this person is with?

Don’t be like the many that most of their life have it in their head they always need to be in a relationship to feel complete.  Complete yourself first and the rest will follow.

Don’t put the things you want aside for anyone thinking that after they’re done using your time to make themselves happy that it will be your turn. It usually never works out that way and it just so happened to be at your own personal expense.

It’s just like how people say you need to make yourself happy first. — Very true.

You need to learn to do it on your own before even thinking about letting someone else enter into your life to share it with.

“DO YOU”, and the rest will fall into place. You will be more content in your solace this way.


(MORE from TJ:

Perversion in The Bible

Straight from the good book; THE HOLY BIBLE.

TJ1These will make you scratch your head and question what the hell was wrong with people and the laws in those times.

These verses are taken from the New International Version (NIV). This particular Bible seems to break down the verbiage more understandable without the “thou, shalt, doeth,” type of crap to deal with.


Genesis 19:4-5

Before they had gone to bed, all the men from every part of the city of Sodom—both young and old—surrounded the house. They called to Lot, “Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us so that we can have sex with them.”

These are ANGELS that the guys are asking to fuck!

Well supposedly, Angles are genderless. So much for the fucking festivities.

But we have a solution to the problem coming up!

 Genesis 19:8

Look, I have two daughters who have never slept with a man. Let me bring them out to you, and you can do what you like with them. But don’t do anything to these men, for they have come under the protection of my roof.

The true meaning of “Pimp Daddy”.

So don’t sleep with these Angels who are my house guests. But, HERE gang bang my kids instead!! Because THAT is justifiable in the eyes of God.

Just give it a minute. Wait till you see what these daughters do.

Genesis 19:30-35

30 Lot and his two daughters left Zoar and settled in the mountains, for he was afraid to stay in Zoar. He and his two daughters lived in a cave. 31 One day the older daughter said to the younger, “Our father is old, and there is no man around here to give us children—as is the custom all over the earth.

32 Let’s get our father to drink wine and then sleep with him and preserve our family line through our father.”

Are you fucking kidding me?

So the Lord rained down burning sulfur on Sodom and Gomorrah leaving you homeless and you can’t take your ass to the nearest town to get your own man? Com’on.

TJ233 That night they got their father to drink wine, and the older daughter went in and slept with him. He was not aware of it when she lay down or when she got up.

Great. Now we’re going to Biblically roofie dad and rape him.

No big deal apparently.

34 The next day the older daughter said to the younger, “Last night I slept with my father. Let’s get him to drink wine again tonight, and you go in and sleep with him so we can preserve our family line through our father.”

Well we can’t leave the other daughter out of the fun.

Let’s compete and see who can fuck dad the best!!

Obviously these two daughters didn’t care their dad whored them out to the townsmen earlier.

35 So they got their father to drink wine that night also, and the younger daughter went in and slept with him. Again he was not aware of it when she lay down or when she got up.

Mind you, the two daughters each bore a son.

Dueling Banjos played at the kid’s birth to celebrate the family tree with no branches.

Genesis 38:8-10

Then Judah said to Onan, “Sleep with your brother’s wife and fulfill your duty to her as a brother-in-law to raise up offspring for your brother.”

But Onan knew that the child would not be his; so whenever he slept with his brother’s wife, he spilled his semen on the ground to keep from providing offspring for his brother. 10 What he did was wicked in the Lord’s sight; so the Lord put him to death also.

Dad thinks it’s the sons DUTY to bang his dead brother’s wife???

We got daughters thinking it’s acceptable to screw their father, and now this??

So a guilt trip sets in and he dumps the baby batter.

Guess what? God kills his ass anyways on account of dad’s shitty advice.

Exodus 4:24-26

24 At a lodging place on the way, the Lord met Moses and was about to kill him.

TJ3a25 But Zipporah took a flint knife, cut off her son’s foreskin and touched Moses’ feet with it. “Surely you are a bridegroom of blood to me,” she said. 26 So the Lord let him alone.

Did Moses’s wife really just bargain basement barter part of her kid’s dick in trade for her husband’s life?

And to do the cut with a fucking knife constructed from a rock?? OUCH!!

I’m puzzled what the hell foreskin is a good trade for anyway unless you’re Buffalo Bill thinking outside of the box for a different style suit.  

Leviticus 18:19

— I guess God figured giving Moses the Ten Commandments to deal with wasn’t going to be enough for him to do, because after to that the poor guy had to pass out a “Who NOT To Fuck” list to everyone.

This is the best one. —

19 “Do not approach a woman to have sexual relations during the uncleanness of her monthly period.”

So much for earning your red wings boys.

Dirty snatch is a no-go for fucking according to God.                              

Deuteronomy 22:20-21 and 28-29

20 If, however, the charge is true and no proof of the young woman’s virginity can be found, 21 she shall be brought to the door of her father’s house and there the men of her town shall stone her to death. She has done an outrageous thing in Israel by being promiscuous while still in her father’s house. You must purge the evil from among you.

Oh… Ok.

So a dad can give up his virgin daughters with no problem for the guys in town to all fuck, (as previously in Genesis 19:8)

But then when they’ve had their way with the gals, the bitches end up with a future death sentence cuz they’re no good for marriage now.

Way to go dad. Nice call.

28 If a man happens to meet a virgin who is not pledged to be married and rapes her and they are discovered, 29 he shall pay her father fifty shekels of silver. He must marry the young woman, for he has violated her. He can never divorce her as long as he lives.

All I have to say is that’s just fucked up!!

These coming up are some obscure miscellaneous sex related laws all within the one book of the Bible:

TJ4Deuteronomy 23:1

“No one who has been emasculated by crushing or cutting may enter the assembly of the Lord.”

In other woooords….if someone pulled a Lorena Bobbitt maneuver on ya; your ass can’t go to church. Weird.

What’s even more disturbing is trying to figure out how one’s nutsack would get crushed.

Deuteronomy 23:17

17 No Israelite man or woman is to become a shrine prostitute. 18 You must not bring the earnings of a female prostitute or of a male prostituteinto the house of the Lord your God to pay any vow, because the Lord your God detests them both.

To me this sound like God isn’t accepting any hooker’s jewelry in the offering plate if she/he was being used in a sexual religious ritual.

Looks like there will be no 10% tithing that day.

Deuteronomy 25:5

If brothers are living together and one of them dies without a son, his widow must not marry outside the family. Her husband’s brother shall take her and marry her and fulfill the duty of a brother-in-law to her. The first son she bears shall carry on the name of the dead brother so that his name will not be blotted out from Israel.

Hold the fucking phone. Remember God’s NO-NO list of Unlawful Sexual Relations that he gave Moses?

Well this next one is of them as to why Onan was killed in Genesis 38 as mentioned above.

Leviticus 18:16

16 “Do not have sexual relations with your brother’s wife; that would dishonor your brother.”

Not to mention where God talks about punishment for sins we have this:

Leviticus 20:21

21 “If a man marries his brother’s wife, it is an act of impurity; he has dishonored his brother. They will be childless.”

Screwing your brother’s wife, even if he dies, was initially on the DO NOT DO list.

Then if you marry her, she ends up with an out-of-order womb.                          

Oh wait. Forget it. – New rules!

Apparently the Hebrews can’t make up their fucking minds of what to do with people here regarding how they interpret what God is telling them to write in these laws.

TJ5aOr maybe God is just indecisive. Who knows.

Deuteronomy 25:11-12

11 If two men are fighting and the wife of one of them comes to rescue her husband from his assailant, and she reaches out and seizes him by his private parts, 12 you shall cut off her hand. Show her no pity.

Why is she yanking him away by his junk in the first place?

This may answer my question though from back from in Deuteronomy 23:1 about the nutsack crushing.

It’s all coming together now.   

1 Samuel 18:25-27

25 Saul replied, “Say to David, ‘The king wants no other price for the bride than a hundred Philistine foreskins, to take revenge on his enemies.’” Saul’s plan was to have David fall by the hands of the Philistines.

26 When the attendants told David these things, he was pleased to become the king’s son-in-law. So before the allotted time elapsed, 27 David took his men with him and went out and killed two hundred Philistines and brought back their foreskins. They counted out the full number to the king so that David might become the king’s son-in-law. Then Saul gave him his daughter Michal in marriage.

So foreskins in exchange for love?

25 chickens, 12 sheep, 9 cows, and a hog weren’t a valuable enough swap for his daughter?

Foreskins seemed to be a hot commodity back then too. (refer back to Exodus verse)

What’s up with that?                                               

Ezekiel 23:19-20

19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Back in the good ol’ days…. *sigh*… cock just hasn’t been the same since…

Matthew 5:27-30

TJ627 You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall not commit adultery. 28 But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart.

29 If your right eye causes you to stumble, gouge it out and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to be thrown into hell. 30 And if your right hand causes you to stumble, cut it off and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to go into hell.

If you’re a married guy who’s tempted to jerk off to porn, you must remove your eyeball and chop your hand off, or face the wrath of fire and brimstone.

Dang. That’s harsh.


Well that’s enough. There’s so much more.

You get the point of how The Bible is irrational when it comes to sex.

I dare you to show this to your personal Clergy and see what they have to say about all of it.


(MORE from TJ:

Valentine’s Day is Over-Rated

Tradition, schmadition.

TJ1All this fluff is catered to the female. We all know this.

The question is: What seems to be the problem with you guys that you don’t put an effort forth to make her feel all warm and fuzzy inside any other time?

“But why did you serve me divorce papers honey? Don’t you at least remember the nice things I did for you on Valentine’s Day??? I just don’t understand!!!”

Yes my loves. The acts partaken in are all nice gestures and appreciation that you do. They don’t go unnoticed or unrecognized.

But in all reality, this day is about as ridiculous as Christmas as far as commercialization. It’s nothing but marketing bullshit.


Here’s a rundown of your so-called ROMANCE for the duration of the day and evening.


CUPID – Who in their right mind wants to be bulls-eye harpooned in the booty by a PSE Dominator Max archery bow and end up in the ER, just to get you to pay attention to someone and make your heart flutter?

More like my butt cheek throbbing in pain now, giving me a gangsta-lean while I limp!

A gaping hole in your ass that’s all bandaged up like a victimized mummy is not attractive.


SAPPY CARDS – You know damn well that you wouldn’t say that Hallmark shit any other day. I bet you need a dictionary AAAAND a thesaurus to even know what half the mushy words in the text mean.

Plus, we ladies know you didn’t even read it. You just grabbed the one with the swirliest script on it and signed your name like chicken scratch inside.


CANDY HEARTS – “You’re Kind”, “Hug Me”, “Be Mine”, “My Cutie”.

TJ2Ugh…  Gag me with a spoon already. We know what you really want to say, and it’s not to be gagged with that spoon either!

We’re not 12 years old anymore. It’s ok to say you really want a fat hard cock slammed down your throat so far that you gurgle on your own saliva.

(I honestly don’t know how all that would fit on one candy heart though.)


FLOWERS – $15.99 on the 13th or 15th, but $50 for a dozen on the 14th.

For that price it better come with complimentary winged booties and a Greek God cap like the FTD guy to serenade her with.

Stick one of those roses in your mouth and do a Spanish tango while you’re at it.


STUFFED ANIMALS – Hooooow old are we??? Does Boo-Boo Bear reeeeally make you sleep better at night when your guy is not there to hold you?

Maybe it’s the floppy ears on the little toy doggie reminding you of your man’s big ol’ Dumbo ears that you tug on when he’s caressing your crotch.

Yeah…sure… that’s it.


JEWELRY – Let me guess. You went to the MALL of all places and got her some 350% marked up recycled gold.

You’d get a better deal from the hustler in the hood with the gold chains and bracelets out of the trunk of his 64’ Impala, rollin’ on 30-inch dubs.


CANDLELIGHT – So you dim the lights and throw some candles on the table.

All’s this means is you won’t need as much of your normal government subsidy to help you out this month since you saved on the electric bill.


TJ3A BOTTLE OF FINE WINE – This does NOT mean go grab some Riunite, or Franzia boxed wine served in a Dixie cup.

Class that shit up. Go get yo’self some Boones Farm Strawberry Hill with Red Solo cups.


DINNER – We eat everyday anyways. What’s the difference due to the date?

Putting the pop-top can of Chef Boyardee ravioli on the fine China instead of the normal paper plate doesn’t make it gourmet cuisine for this “special” day.


WE’RE FINALLY GONNA HAVE SEX!!! – What the hell are you people doing the other 364-days of the year that you’re waiting for this day to arrive?

This is why your vagina has cobwebs on it like a haunted house attic, and your man has constant blue balls that could be mistaken for a bushel of fresh harvest blueberries.


LINGERIE – Why are you not dressing sexy any other fucking day to begin with? What’s wrong with you women? This is part of why the other 364-days are so lame for you two.

Walmart has schnazy enough looking goodies where you don’t have to pay overrated Victoria Secret prices. Get with the program.


CHOCOLATES, STRAWBERRIES, AND WHIP CREAM – Here we go with a reenactment of 9 ½ weeks. Have fun rolling around in that crap all stuck to your nut-sack and up in your vag.

Besides, why are you guys insistent upon making your woman fat, diabetic, and full of cavities? She’ll be much prettier with a full set of teeth. This is probably why she’s not wearing the lingerie any other time of the year since you keep giving her sweets and plumping her up.


MOOD MUSIC – First, your guy creeps up under the bedroom window with a boom box in the air thinking he’s John Cusack and blasts “In Your Eyes” for the whole neighborhood to hear.

TJ4Then you sing Barry White and Marvin Gaye to each other the rest of the night like a drunken fest at karaoke. And you think it sounds good!


PORN – So you guys think you’re slick and use today as an excuse to introduce your fetishes because it’s how you can “express your love”. You’re killin’ me Smalls.

If you can’t bring that shit on the rest of the year to enjoy, you may want to find a NEW Valentine for next year.


HEART-STRING MOVIES – If you wouldn’t willingly rent Casablanca, Breakfast at Tiffany’s, or Shakespeare in Love any other time, you’re not going to enjoy them tonight any differently.

Put the damn porn back on already.



You really want to tickle her fancy? Get her a dildo for Valentine’s Day.

Literally, it WILL tickle her…


(MORE from TJ:

Attraction to Stepsiblings…

I met someone the other day that approached me in a way I found quite disturbing as a pick-up method for an introductory first conversation.

They told me they wanted me to play the naughty stepsister, and… you can fill in the blanks.

I expressed to him that is not my sexual forte. Not interested.

AT1I was then accused of being boring for denying his roll-play offer.

Well if not reenacting a cliché trailer park scene brought to you from an unknown, named Arkansas town near you means I’m boring; then I guess that’s what I am.

We briefly debated as to whether the scenario constitutes as incest or not.

Let’s evaluate this…

Incest is defined as such:

1. sexual intercourse between closely related persons.

2. the crime of sexual intercourse, cohabitation, or marriage between persons within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity wherein marriage is legally forbidden.

(, “incest,” in Unabridged. Source location: Random House, Inc.

Notice there are two significant words in the second part of the definition.

First, there is “Consanguinity” meaning a close relationship or connection by descent from a common ancestor. Otherwise it is a blood lineage relation.

Second, “Affinity” is still an attraction or connection, but opposite in the way of it being with someone other than those of blood relation.

By definition, that makes sexual activity between stepsiblings described as incest, minus the marriage part which is an “or” factor anyway.

Knowing of this being an illegal and morally wrong situation at hand, why do some have this sexual fantasy of being with a stepsibling?

Is it wrong to express this desire? Is it sick and twisted since your families have joined as one to unite?

AT2It would kind of make the holidays awkward to me.

Stories of this desire are looked at by many as being HOT.

Turn these family members into a situation of a stepfather and stepdaughter, and now there’s an atrocity of damnation, even though there is still no blood relation.

So what’s the difference in the moral value between the two men if it be the father or the son performing the sex act on the young female?

Is the compulsion just because it’s taboo?

Biologically, it’s a normal reaction to be aroused by someone attractive.

However, it is not culturally acceptable to follow through and interact sexually on that attraction with an added non-blood family member.

We can appreciate the beauty of someone in our life without acting on a hormonal desire that is lust based.

So of all the people in the world, why them? Why the step-sibling?

Now I’m no licensed clinical psychologist, but in my studies many years ago, my emphasis just so happened to be in Forensic Psychology with a Criminal Justice degree program to know enough of how the mind works to provide my own decent theoretical analysis of this situation.

My theory of this conception is it due to the newness of trying to seek approval of the added family member, and a sexual bond is what is resorted to for a connection.

This could be almost as a psychological dominance over the other person.

Another part to my behavioral theory is that the teens are learning to cope with the divorce so they latch on to someone their age to compensate for the absented love of the parent no longer in the household.

That person just so happens to be another teen experiencing the exact same circumstance obviously. Being under the same roof is convenient and comforting in the same. They’re on the same brain wavelength with each other as to what they’re feeling.

AT3Let’s add as a teen first learning about sexuality, these now-siblings may be growing to be the closest thing to one another to try and grasp an understanding of what their bodies are hormonally going through.

They develop a trust between each other to learn about sex, and feel it is harmless since they aren’t blood related.

Two possibilities as a result:

This fantasy carries over as an adult emotionally from not being able to fulfill that curiosity with a stepsibling as a youth, and they need a way to close the door on that part of their life.

So there is a craving to complete the sexual act with someone who reminds them of the stepsibling.

Another possibility is if there was a sexual relationship experienced with the stepsibling that got them through the emotional trauma as teens from the changing family environment; they relate that memory of the stepsibling to new potential sex partners they meet as an adult.

This is the way they psychologically associate bonding with the opposite sex since it was solace and soothing during a confusing time in their earlier life.

So it could be looked at as their way of gaining closeness to another of the opposite sex like they did with that stepsibling; and as an adult subconsciously want to act out the physical part in a pretend setting to fulfill the overall pleasant emotions felt together when younger.

It’s fascinating how the mind works when responding to emotions like this.

In psychology, memory association is the connections between conceptual entities or mental states that results from the similarity between those states or their proximity in space or time.

In this case it is interlinking memories of previous experiences when most content to fulfill how to seek current and future happiness.

Then the psychological process continues over and over again with new memories of happiness, but then combining the old with the new.

I think those individuals who have dealt with situations like this during their sexual development with a stepsibling will as an adult always have an underlying way of wanting to connect with a person of the opposite sex who reminds them of the other due to that attachment as a child.

After all, they probably got each other through it all back then.

AT4Does it make it right to keep having sexual thoughts about a non-blood related family member?

Well who are we to really decide how others deal with what makes them feel loved?

I say just let them be. But sorry, I’m not the one you’re going to live out that fantasy with.  I’m sure there are those out there who are willing though.

Maybe another person with the same emotional trauma would suit them best.

They could be their own therapy! A match made in heaven.


(MORE from TJ:

(EXPLICIT!) How Much for that Kitty in the Window?

So you’re out window-shopping for tail.

You find a cute kitty cat – think she’s a ho – but you’ll still fuck her.

TJ1She’s sexually active, comfortable with her own sexuality, and knows what turns her on; but unless all this is happening with you, she’s a slut.

Well who is anyone to say how they choose to enjoy their body? Do we judge you for jerking off to porn of oiled up midgets screwing on a pogo stick while bouncing on a trampoline?


As long as there are no relations with any blood relatives, children, or farm animals, it’s all groovy cool.

It doesn’t make a female any less of a lady because she’s in tune with her body and has raging hormones like you do.

A dude can go bang whomever, whenever? But when a chick does it she’s in the wrong?


She doesn’t need anyone’s permission to do a fly-by or fill her landing pattern up with cock.

While we’re talking about a woman doing as she pleases with her body; let’s talk about money for sex a minute here.

So males will go to a club and pick up a random, not knowing her sexual past; to include a medical history. NO CLUE what they are about to get themselves into, yet they’re cool with that.

But hold the phone! You find out a female has partaken in a sexual act in the past for an exchange of monetary value, and suddenly you wouldn’t pork this same gal?

I’m sorry, but a past dicking is a dicking whether ya’ like the circumstances or not.

You both are fucking to fuck. Only in the former situation, she probably just made her car note, and the money spent on her came out of the percentage of the pie chart the guy budgeted for entertainment purposes anyway.

What’s that, sir? You don’t haaaave to pay for sex you say???

Au contraire mon frère.

Remember that girl in the nightclub?

How many tasty alcoholic frou-frou drinks or lines of cocaine did you buy her before you were able to convince her altered state of mind it was a good idea to allow you to bend that phat ass over in the beer cooler?

Aaaaah. See? BUSTED!

TJ2Now how about those ladies you actually took on real dates?

Well we all know a man doesn’t pursue a woman he’s not sexually attracted to. That’s a given.

So let’s tally up the cost of those DRINKS AGAIN, dinners, dancing, movies, Cirque du Soleil show, county fair, gambling at the casino, rock concert, go-kart track, raccoon hunting trips (gotta buy ammo and supplies for the camp site), or whatever absurd activity that’s her poison; all in hopes that you will eventually…. WHAT?

Dat’s right homie — IN HOPES YOU GET LAID.

Well guess what? Ya’ just PAID FOR SEX in a sense when it’s all said and done babe.

Awe, and that shit ain’t even guaranteed fancy pants, but you foot the bill for some time with her anyway because you just never know.

Now, I ask you to marinate on this for a bit:

If you do get some nookie after having spent money on her during the date, does that constitute as a means of exchange in value for the sex; thus placing her in the category of a whore like the gal who received a lump of cash instead to spend how she chooses, and not by how you chose for her when taking her out?

Tricky logic, isn’t it?

HOLD UP. There’s a late night creep or friend with benefits in your life?

Gas in the ride to get to her crib – you paid for it. BAAA HAAA!

You may have even picked up some nasty Chinese take-out or rented a bogus movie on the way over too, trying to make it look good for your courtesy-fucking.

After all, that’s what any decent guy would if you want her to feel some kinda special and keep coming back for more!

It’s always something costing money. You can’t avoid it. Sooner or later the VAJAYJAY is bound to hit your wallet.

Let’s move forward to having found commitment and moving in together; or better yet marrying her.

TJ3Rent or mortgage, utilities, auto payment, feeding her pie hole, etc.

There are some men out there who choose to be the sole bread winner and not want their woman to work. Some even demand that egotistical dominance of earning a higher salary, so more financial responsibility ends up lying on his end nonetheless.

Therefore; the trade is PUNANNY for paying bills and taking care of her. If you’re lucky maybe she at least cooks and cleans too, and continues to fuck you.

Divorce her and now there’s alimony. You just can’t get out of paying even when you don’t technically own that TWINKIE anymore!

Hence the phrase: CHEAPER TO KEEP HER when talk of divorce ever lingers the air.

Right about now you’re thinking to yourself like Dr. Evil with a pinky to your mouth, “Huuum. My overall cost seems to be relevant, if not cheaper, for a lady of the evening taking cash for only a few minutes of our time so I can get laid, doesn’t it?”

Now I know all of this sounds super shitty, and many probably do not like to hear it. But you have to admit, it is a different twist on things.

Every perspective in life can’t be all rainbows and sunshine with blooming daisies, and dancing pixies serenading you with sprinkles of glitter. We need diversity to make us think dammit!

By now you may be wondering, “Is she advocating the professional fuckery industry?”

Well I know I wouldn’t judge a woman if she had made a decision to accept a trade for sex. Let’s just say it doesn’t affect me, nor is it my business what others choose to do with their sex life.

TJ4As long as they make the effort to keep their body’s healthy, I don’t care. Because I mean after all, I may end up fucking one of these same guys one day and am not trying to catch a case of the cooties.

If you’re gonna live that open of a lifestyle, WRAP THAT WIENER UP LIKE A PIG IN A BLANKET POR FAVOR. We can’t have your frankfurter looking like Frankenstein or contracting sex pests.

Aside the situation of whether it is from picking up in a bar, to a date, to marriage; when that dick crosses the finish line, guys end up forking out cash for sex one way or another.

Well be safe – estimate your pussy expenditures accurately – and happy humping!


(MORE from TJ:

collage no names